Require Import Recdef Coqlib Maps Errors.
Local Open Scope nat_scope.
Local Open Scope error_monad_scope.
This module provides a solver for sets of unification constraints of the
following kinds: T(x) = base-type or T(x) = T(y).
The unknowns are the types T(x) of every identifier x.
The interface for base types.
Module Type TYPE_ALGEBRA.
Variable t:
Type.
Variable eq:
forall (
x y:
t), {
x=
y} + {
x<>
y}.
Variable default:
t.
End TYPE_ALGEBRA.
The constraint solver.
Module UniSolver (
T:
TYPE_ALGEBRA).
Definition constraint :
Type := (
positive *
positive)%
type.
Record typenv :
Type :=
Typenv {
te_typ:
PTree.t T.t;
(* mapping var -> typ *)
te_equ:
list constraint (* additional equality constraints *)
}.
Definition initial :
typenv := {|
te_typ :=
PTree.empty _;
te_equ :=
nil |}.
Add the constraint T(x) = ty.
Definition set (
e:
typenv) (
x:
positive) (
ty:
T.t) :
res typenv :=
match e.(
te_typ)!
x with
|
None =>
OK {|
te_typ :=
PTree.set x ty e.(
te_typ);
te_equ :=
e.(
te_equ) |}
|
Some ty' =>
if T.eq ty ty'
then OK e
else Error (
MSG "
bad definition/
use of variable " ::
POS x ::
nil)
end.
Fixpoint set_list (
e:
typenv) (
rl:
list positive) (
tyl:
list T.t) {
struct rl}:
res typenv :=
match rl,
tyl with
|
nil,
nil =>
OK e
|
r1::
rs,
ty1::
tys =>
do e1 <-
set e r1 ty1;
set_list e1 rs tys
|
_,
_ =>
Error (
msg "
arity mismatch")
end.
Add the constraint T(x) = T(y).
The boolean result is true if the types of x or y could be
made more precise. Otherwise, te_typ does not change and
false is returned.
Definition move (
e:
typenv) (
r1 r2:
positive) :
res (
bool *
typenv) :=
if peq r1 r2 then OK (
false,
e)
else
match e.(
te_typ)!
r1,
e.(
te_typ)!
r2 with
|
None,
None =>
OK (
false, {|
te_typ :=
e.(
te_typ);
te_equ := (
r1,
r2) ::
e.(
te_equ) |})
|
Some ty1,
None =>
OK (
true, {|
te_typ :=
PTree.set r2 ty1 e.(
te_typ);
te_equ :=
e.(
te_equ) |})
|
None,
Some ty2 =>
OK (
true, {|
te_typ :=
PTree.set r1 ty2 e.(
te_typ);
te_equ :=
e.(
te_equ) |})
|
Some ty1,
Some ty2 =>
if T.eq ty1 ty2
then OK (
false,
e)
else Error(
MSG "
ill-
typed move from " ::
POS r1 ::
MSG "
to " ::
POS r2 ::
nil)
end.
Solve the remaining subtyping constraints by iteration.
Fixpoint solve_rec (
e:
typenv) (
changed:
bool) (
q:
list constraint) :
res (
typenv *
bool) :=
match q with
|
nil =>
OK (
e,
changed)
| (
r1,
r2) ::
q' =>
do (
changed1,
e1) <-
move e r1 r2;
solve_rec e1 (
changed ||
changed1)
q'
end.
Measuring the state
Lemma move_shape:
forall e r1 r2 changed e',
move e r1 r2 =
OK (
changed,
e') ->
(
e'.(
te_equ) =
e.(
te_equ) \/
e'.(
te_equ) = (
r1,
r2) ::
e.(
te_equ))
/\ (
changed =
true ->
e'.(
te_equ) =
e.(
te_equ)).
Proof.
unfold move;
intros.
destruct (
peq r1 r2).
inv H.
auto.
destruct e.(
te_typ)!
r1 as [
ty1|];
destruct e.(
te_typ)!
r2 as [
ty2|];
inv H;
simpl.
destruct (
T.eq ty1 ty2);
inv H1.
auto.
auto.
auto.
split.
auto.
intros.
discriminate.
Qed.
Lemma length_move:
forall e r1 r2 changed e',
move e r1 r2 =
OK (
changed,
e') ->
length e'.(
te_equ) + (
if changed then 1
else 0) <=
S(
length e.(
te_equ)).
Proof.
unfold move;
intros.
destruct (
peq r1 r2).
inv H.
omega.
destruct e.(
te_typ)!
r1 as [
ty1|];
destruct e.(
te_typ)!
r2 as [
ty2|];
inv H;
simpl.
destruct (
T.eq ty1 ty2);
inv H1.
omega.
omega.
omega.
omega.
Qed.
Lemma length_solve_rec:
forall q e ch e'
ch',
solve_rec e ch q =
OK (
e',
ch') ->
length e'.(
te_equ) + (
if ch' &&
negb ch then 1
else 0) <=
length e.(
te_equ) +
length q.
Proof.
induction q;
simpl;
intros.
-
inv H.
replace (
ch' &&
negb ch')
with false.
omega.
destruct ch';
auto.
-
destruct a as [
r1 r2];
monadInv H.
rename x0 into e0.
rename x into ch0.
exploit IHq;
eauto.
intros A.
exploit length_move;
eauto.
intros B.
set (
X := (
if ch' &&
negb (
ch ||
ch0)
then 1
else 0))
in *.
set (
Y := (
if ch0 then 1
else 0))
in *.
set (
Z := (
if ch' &&
negb ch then 1
else 0))
in *.
cut (
Z <=
X +
Y).
intros.
omega.
unfold X,
Y,
Z.
destruct ch';
destruct ch;
destruct ch0;
simpl;
auto.
Qed.
Definition weight_typenv (
e:
typenv) :
nat :=
length e.(
te_equ).
Iterative solving of the remaining constraints
Function solve_constraints (
e:
typenv) {
measure weight_typenv e}:
res typenv :=
match solve_rec {|
te_typ :=
e.(
te_typ);
te_equ :=
nil |}
false e.(
te_equ)
with
|
OK(
e',
false) =>
OK e (* no more changes, fixpoint reached *)
|
OK(
e',
true) =>
solve_constraints e'
(* one more iteration *)
|
Error msg =>
Error msg
end.
Proof.
Definition typassign :=
positive ->
T.t.
Definition makeassign (
e:
typenv) :
typassign :=
fun x =>
match e.(
te_typ)!
x with Some ty =>
ty |
None =>
T.default end.
Definition solve (
e:
typenv) :
res typassign :=
do e' <-
solve_constraints e;
OK(
makeassign e').
What it means to be a solution
Definition satisf (
te:
typassign) (
e:
typenv) :
Prop :=
(
forall x ty,
e.(
te_typ)!
x =
Some ty ->
te x =
ty)
/\ (
forall x y,
In (
x,
y)
e.(
te_equ) ->
te x =
te y).
Lemma satisf_initial:
forall te,
satisf te initial.
Proof.
unfold initial;
intros;
split;
simpl;
intros.
rewrite PTree.gempty in H;
discriminate.
contradiction.
Qed.
Soundness proof
Lemma set_incr:
forall te x ty e e',
set e x ty =
OK e' ->
satisf te e' ->
satisf te e.
Proof.
unfold set;
intros.
destruct (
te_typ e)!
x as [
ty'|]
eqn:
E.
-
destruct (
T.eq ty ty');
inv H.
auto.
-
inv H.
destruct H0 as [
A B];
simpl in *.
red;
split;
intros;
auto.
apply A.
rewrite PTree.gso by congruence.
auto.
Qed.
Hint Resolve set_incr:
ty.
Lemma set_sound:
forall te x ty e e',
set e x ty =
OK e' ->
satisf te e' ->
te x =
ty.
Proof.
unfold set;
intros.
destruct H0 as [
P Q].
destruct (
te_typ e)!
x as [
ty'|]
eqn:
E.
-
destruct (
T.eq ty ty');
inv H.
eauto.
-
inv H.
simpl in P.
apply P.
apply PTree.gss.
Qed.
Lemma set_list_incr:
forall te xl tyl e e',
set_list e xl tyl =
OK e' ->
satisf te e' ->
satisf te e.
Proof.
induction xl; destruct tyl; simpl; intros; monadInv H; eauto with ty.
Qed.
Hint Resolve set_list_incr:
ty.
Lemma set_list_sound:
forall te xl tyl e e',
set_list e xl tyl =
OK e' ->
satisf te e' ->
map te xl =
tyl.
Proof.
induction xl;
destruct tyl;
simpl;
intros;
monadInv H.
auto.
f_equal.
eapply set_sound;
eauto with ty.
eauto.
Qed.
Lemma move_incr:
forall te e r1 r2 e'
changed,
move e r1 r2 =
OK(
changed,
e') ->
satisf te e' ->
satisf te e.
Proof.
unfold move;
intros.
destruct H0 as [
P Q].
destruct (
peq r1 r2).
inv H;
split;
auto.
destruct (
te_typ e)!
r1 as [
ty1|]
eqn:
E1;
destruct (
te_typ e)!
r2 as [
ty2|]
eqn:
E2.
-
destruct (
T.eq ty1 ty2);
inv H.
split;
auto.
-
inv H;
simpl in *;
split;
auto.
intros.
apply P.
rewrite PTree.gso by congruence.
auto.
-
inv H;
simpl in *;
split;
auto.
intros.
apply P.
rewrite PTree.gso by congruence.
auto.
-
inv H;
simpl in *;
split;
auto.
Qed.
Hint Resolve move_incr:
ty.
Lemma move_sound:
forall te e r1 r2 e'
changed,
move e r1 r2 =
OK(
changed,
e') ->
satisf te e' ->
te r1 =
te r2.
Proof.
unfold move;
intros.
destruct H0 as [
P Q].
destruct (
peq r1 r2).
congruence.
destruct (
te_typ e)!
r1 as [
ty1|]
eqn:
E1;
destruct (
te_typ e)!
r2 as [
ty2|]
eqn:
E2.
-
destruct (
T.eq ty1 ty2);
inv H.
erewrite !
P by eauto.
auto.
-
inv H;
simpl in *.
rewrite (
P r1 ty1).
rewrite (
P r2 ty1).
auto.
apply PTree.gss.
rewrite PTree.gso by congruence.
auto.
-
inv H;
simpl in *.
rewrite (
P r1 ty2).
rewrite (
P r2 ty2).
auto.
rewrite PTree.gso by congruence.
auto.
apply PTree.gss.
-
inv H;
simpl in *.
apply Q;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma solve_rec_incr:
forall te q e changed e'
changed',
solve_rec e changed q =
OK(
e',
changed') ->
satisf te e' ->
satisf te e.
Proof.
induction q; simpl; intros.
- inv H. auto.
- destruct a as [r1 r2]; monadInv H. eauto with ty.
Qed.
Lemma solve_rec_sound:
forall te r1 r2 q e changed e'
changed',
solve_rec e changed q =
OK(
e',
changed') ->
In (
r1,
r2)
q ->
satisf te e' ->
te r1 =
te r2.
Proof.
induction q;
simpl;
intros.
-
contradiction.
-
destruct a as [
r3 r4];
monadInv H.
destruct H0.
+
inv H.
eapply move_sound;
eauto.
eapply solve_rec_incr;
eauto.
+
eapply IHq;
eauto with ty.
Qed.
Lemma move_false:
forall e r1 r2 e',
move e r1 r2 =
OK(
false,
e') ->
te_typ e' =
te_typ e /\
makeassign e r1 =
makeassign e r2.
Proof.
unfold move;
intros.
destruct (
peq r1 r2).
inv H.
split;
auto.
unfold makeassign;
destruct (
te_typ e)!
r1 as [
ty1|]
eqn:
E1;
destruct (
te_typ e)!
r2 as [
ty2|]
eqn:
E2.
-
destruct (
T.eq ty1 ty2);
inv H.
auto.
-
discriminate.
-
discriminate.
-
inv H.
split;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma solve_rec_false:
forall r1 r2 q e changed e',
solve_rec e changed q =
OK(
e',
false) ->
changed =
false /\
(
In (
r1,
r2)
q ->
makeassign e r1 =
makeassign e r2).
Proof.
induction q;
simpl;
intros.
-
inv H.
tauto.
-
destruct a as [
r3 r4];
monadInv H.
exploit IHq;
eauto.
intros [
P Q].
destruct changed;
try discriminate.
destruct x;
try discriminate.
exploit move_false;
eauto.
intros [
U V].
split.
auto.
intros [
A|
A].
inv A.
auto.
exploit Q;
auto.
unfold makeassign;
rewrite U;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma solve_constraints_incr:
forall te e e',
solve_constraints e =
OK e' ->
satisf te e' ->
satisf te e.
Proof.
Lemma solve_constraints_sound:
forall e e',
solve_constraints e =
OK e' ->
satisf (
makeassign e')
e'.
Proof.
intros e0;
functional induction (
solve_constraints e0);
intros.
-
inv H.
split;
intros.
unfold makeassign;
rewrite H.
split;
auto with ty.
exploit solve_rec_false.
eauto.
intros [
A B].
eapply B;
eauto.
-
eauto.
-
discriminate.
Qed.
Theorem solve_sound:
forall e te,
solve e =
OK te ->
satisf te e.
Proof.
Completeness proof
Lemma set_complete:
forall te e x ty,
satisf te e ->
te x =
ty ->
exists e',
set e x ty =
OK e' /\
satisf te e'.
Proof.
unfold set;
intros.
generalize H;
intros [
P Q].
destruct (
te_typ e)!
x as [
ty1|]
eqn:
E.
-
replace ty1 with ty.
rewrite dec_eq_true.
exists e;
auto.
exploit P;
eauto.
congruence.
-
econstructor;
split;
eauto.
split;
simpl;
intros;
auto.
rewrite PTree.gsspec in H1.
destruct (
peq x0 x).
congruence.
eauto.
Qed.
Lemma set_list_complete:
forall te xl tyl e,
satisf te e ->
map te xl =
tyl ->
exists e',
set_list e xl tyl =
OK e' /\
satisf te e'.
Proof.
induction xl;
intros;
inv H0;
simpl.
econstructor;
eauto.
exploit (
set_complete te e a (
te a));
auto.
intros (
e1 &
P &
Q).
exploit (
IHxl (
map te xl)
e1);
auto.
intros (
e2 &
U &
V).
exists e2;
split;
auto.
rewrite P;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma move_complete:
forall te e r1 r2,
satisf te e ->
te r1 =
te r2 ->
exists changed e',
move e r1 r2 =
OK(
changed,
e') /\
satisf te e'.
Proof.
unfold move;
intros.
elim H;
intros P Q.
assert (
Q':
forall x y,
In (
x,
y) ((
r1,
r2) ::
te_equ e) ->
te x =
te y).
{
intros.
destruct H1;
auto.
congruence. }
destruct (
peq r1 r2).
econstructor;
econstructor;
eauto.
destruct (
te_typ e)!
r1 as [
ty1|]
eqn:
E1;
destruct (
te_typ e)!
r2 as [
ty2|]
eqn:
E2.
-
replace ty2 with ty1.
rewrite dec_eq_true.
econstructor;
econstructor;
eauto.
exploit (
P r1);
eauto.
exploit (
P r2);
eauto.
congruence.
-
econstructor;
econstructor;
split;
eauto.
split;
simpl;
intros;
auto.
rewrite PTree.gsspec in H1.
destruct (
peq x r2).
inv H1.
rewrite <-
H0.
eauto.
eauto.
-
econstructor;
econstructor;
split;
eauto.
split;
simpl;
intros;
auto.
rewrite PTree.gsspec in H1.
destruct (
peq x r1).
inv H1.
rewrite H0.
eauto.
eauto.
-
econstructor;
econstructor;
split;
eauto.
split;
eauto.
Qed.
Lemma solve_rec_complete:
forall te q e changed,
satisf te e ->
(
forall r1 r2,
In (
r1,
r2)
q ->
te r1 =
te r2) ->
exists e'
changed',
solve_rec e changed q =
OK(
e',
changed') /\
satisf te e'.
Proof.
induction q;
simpl;
intros.
-
econstructor;
econstructor;
eauto.
-
destruct a as [
r1 r2].
exploit (
move_complete te e r1 r2);
auto.
intros (
changed1 &
e1 &
A &
B).
exploit (
IHq e1 (
changed ||
changed1));
auto.
intros (
e' &
changed' &
C &
D).
exists e';
exists changed'.
rewrite A;
simpl;
rewrite C;
auto.
Qed.
Lemma solve_constraints_complete:
forall te e,
satisf te e ->
exists e',
solve_constraints e =
OK e' /\
satisf te e'.
Proof.
Lemma solve_complete:
forall te e,
satisf te e ->
exists te',
solve e =
OK te'.
Proof.
End UniSolver.